|
To any viewers, please send this
webpage to the US ex-President Bush. When will the large favor the owed to Mr. Lin (lzm) be repaid?
Because ex-President Bush
to
break his promise
and
tort,
lzm have no choice and preparation sue to Bush
at law now!
lzm in the court of
ShenZhen city of China on June 21, 2011
|
To
help the USA to defeat the terror of
911 case and to prop up stock quotes is lzm's invention of
"three
measures of aviation security", the president-Bush who
was to
announce
on Sep.27, 2001
The Jiang ZeMin cannot
be designated as a guilty person of history!
But you are a USA president! The term of
office was limited, the
president-Bush's
a promise for knowledge property right of lzm it will pay to
cash in what time?
At pm four o’clock on September 26 2001, Bush was to pass
through Mr. Liu of USA consulate
in Hong Kong
to told the inventor Mr. Lin Zhen Man over the phone of
852-23440137: “...Mr.
Lin Zhen Man, I was on behalf of American Government express
and president Bush thanks to you, and to guarantee your patent
application to give in American... ”
|
Bush
President
|
Because lzm's (Lim
Zhen man) telephone was eavesdropped for a long time, soon, in
the TV news was to saw,
ex- Jiang Zemin of Chinese Chairman who was zeal especially
to
entertain Bush
and leader of Asia
various
country with to sign the
“anti-terrorism
declaration” in Shanghai on October of
2001year, but the
Chinese Premier
Zhu Rongji was for squeezed and seen the film in Guangzhou
that was suspiciously!
In fact that had trade besides under the platform, it by
later on of the
state of affair to
verify, that have trade besides under the platform on the
grand meeting
locality.
Soon, the
facts to show the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs was to
endure violates that Law of Taiwan Relation to selling 8
submarines and other offensive weapons to Taiwan case and only
stop in words!
And another side, it was
be bound to
under suggestion of Bush, the patent application of “aviation safe three measure” was to
become invalid by US patent office with a bold hand!!
It
is obvious that, this is an
exchange filthy of under
the platform! It was
difficult to make people
rust, one lofty
status’s US President that could to
break one's word for
help him of one
Hong Kong
person!
|
Jiang
Zemin was
to betray the national defense benefits to barter for Bush
to break one's promise and not to admit lzm’s invent patent!
|
由於布殊的失信,
lzm
也要去信從
www.ycec.sg/UN/LT-to-Bush-031128.htm 清楚可見!
Why the ex-Chairman of China Mr. Jiang Zemin can to betray the
interests of national defense in exchange for
Bush to break his promise
for inventor Mr. Lin ZM? Can to see the:
www.ycec.sg/UN/150117.htm &
www.ycec.sg/Jzm/MH370_Charlie-Weekly.htm
And why Bush must to
docile assist CP-China to conceal the medicine invention of PCT/SG03/00145
that invent still by Mr. Lin for save the SARS
calamity in China & HK on 2003year?
Because this
invention already to destroy the China & USA two empire dynasty
their obscurantist means by Vaccine-Shot, so their trickery just to
unmask in HK now:
www.ycec.sg/HK/patent.htm
Now,return
to the subject of the
Application No. 10/029,951 in USA patent Office:
Below
is the system of "three
measures of aviation security" :
The history
will
be to forget, is the
ex-president Bush was to
wrong
accept ex-Chinese
Chairman Jiang Zemin’s
tacitly agree sell arms
to Taiwan for swap Bush retract promise of let lzm’s invention of "three
measures of aviation security" to obtain US patent at the China
Shanghai’s meeting of “anti-terrorism declaration” on October of
2001year. |
The fact just is this, because the
ex-president
Bush was un-esteem who self promise for lzm, so the US Patent Office was
rude to cancel US Patent Application No. 10/029,951, the US patent
office websites was records inventor "abandonment for Failure to Respond to Office Action",
but Respond to Office Action had
verify by HongKong Post and irrefutable
evidence by US Post
to shown, why the US Patent
Office as a rude
monster unexpectedly?
The
patent application of above the "three
measures of aviation security" in
USA
Patent Office
Second
Office Action on Jun.14, 2003
|
The
US patent office websites was to play a
practical joke and
records
arrogation because the
inventor"
abandonment
for
Failure to Respond to Office Action"at
their
Respond to Office Action,
below:
File Contents History |
Number |
Date |
Contents Description
|
30 |
01-07-2004 |
Mail Abandonment for Failure to Respond to Office Action
|
29 |
01-06-2004 |
Abandonment for Failure to Respond to Office Action
|
28 |
06-20-2003 |
Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326) |
27 |
06-16-2003 |
Final Rejection |
As above listed
of 29, The official archive openly on
01-06-2004
that was to shown because applicant
"Failure to Respond to Office Action",
so the
Application No. 10/029,951 was
"Abandonment !
But,
not only
a registered verify of applicant’s
response and
send out by Hong Kong Post on
Dec.02, 2003
, and the American Postal also to reply the US Patent Office
that had to
receiving on
Dec.09, 2003!
This is only the United
States Patent and discipline violation testimony before
President George W. Bush promised to Hong Kong keep a hoax, but
we can see , this 10 / 029,951 patent applications in the United
States to suspend the applicant invention is not responsible for
Wang, US 10 / 029,951 still continued following the exist !
Above the fact
by the USA Patent
office that just can to witness
ex-President George Bush to break one's word for inventor
a
prank, but this US 10/029,951
patent applications
still continued following the exist,
because pause duty not from
invention applicant that was irrefutable already!
Therefore,
notwithstanding this
applications it already be to
illegal to freeze 12years up to now, the name of
e-channel, SmartGate or self boarding gates etc. use in
Customs of any country even
the
“single person checkroom” of
double-door
that
to belong to the claim in this
invention applicant, so must to indemnification for
inventor.
Besides,
you may to see this
invention patent application use in France :
www.ycec.sg/911/Patent_in_fr.htm
|
|
18 |
Letter
to US
Patent Officer on Mar.26, 2004
|
Mar.26, 2004 |
But,
the US
examiner to
disappear still! |
17 |
Resend
AMENDMENT-list
resend again on Feb.09,
2004,
|
Feb.09, 2004 |
The
HK Post was to verify the US officer was received the response
document again on
Apr.16,
2004
But the
US
examiner to
disappear
still!
|
16
|
Letter
to the examiner for
request
resend the respond to Office Action again!
|
Jan. 24, 2004 |
The US
examiner to
disappear still!
|
15 |
Because
dishonest
examine by
us
patent office, so
lzm to lose hope from Bush's promise and a letter by
a special delivery
pass
through American consulate in Hong Kong
transmit to
Bush
on
Dec.02, 2003.
|
14 |
The
registration
mail of HK Post on
Dec.02, 2003 and
US Post was to
identify on
Feb.24, 2004, but the US
examiner to
disappear! |
13
|
CLAIM
CHANGES
|
Nov. 28,
2003
|
Letter
to examiner’s supervisor 281103
|
|
New-SPECIFICATION
News Fig1.
Fig.2
Fig.3
Fig.4
Fig.5
Fig.6
|
Nov. 28,
2003
|
Letter
to Mr. Dinh of Examiner
271003
|
|
Amendment by inventor
|
Nov. 28,
2003
|
The
registration
mail of HK Post on
Dec.02, 2003
|
12
|
ShenZhen Agent
had aLetter to Mr. Dinh of Examiner on
July,15, 2003
or by
an oath
at Hong Kong!
As a result of it
was thus clear by the USA Patent
Application publication on Oct. 31, 2002, the "f" point
to two dotted line of the Fig. 1 & Fig. 4 that was
deleted without reason. This was
be bound to concern the
agency of invent
applicant
by the "RABIN & BERDO, P.C." of Washington or
ally to
prank from USA Patent
Office!
Therefore, invent applicant at once to call on the
original agency in ShanZhen city of China by a latter to
the examine
Mr. Dinh for clarify
some facts, so this letter was a very important
history witness! |
11 |
Second
Office Action on
June.14, 2003
In the Conclusion from this office
Action
document
that was to shown:
"... In
no event, however, will the statutory period for reply
expire late than SIX MONTHS
from the date of this final action"!.
Therefore, the
reply expire for USA patent
office is December 20, 2003!
Because the
patent application agency by the "RABIN & BERDO,
P.C." of Washington already
to begin wicked, so this
reply expire for USA patent
office by invent applicant
self at Hong Kong by a
registered letter on
December 02, 2003, but the USA patent office again and
again to villainous to be perverse
at
their "File Contents History:
"Mail Abandonment for Failure to Respond to Office Action"
!
Nonsense, to see the
preceding case!
|
|
10
|
ATTACHMENT C -- PROPOSED DRAWING CHANGES
|
12-11-02
|
9
|
MARKED-UP
-- CLAIM CHANGES
|
12-11-02
|
8
|
ATTACHMENT B -- CLAIM CHANGES
|
12-11-02
|
7
|
MARKED-UP
SPECIFICATION
Specification
|
12-11-02
|
6
|
ATTACHMENT A -- SUBSTITUTE SPECIFICATION
|
12-11-02
|
If American Patent Office to examination have not double standard,
this patent is already to be very sure
!
如果美國專利局的审查不存在雙重標準,
本專利已是十拿九稳!
US patent office was
publication on October
31, 2002
http://appft1.uspto.gov/.../DN/20020158166#top
or
DN/20020158166-Publication
|
First
Office Action on
August
11, 2002
|
|
Patent
Code
|
inventor
|
Date
|
|
Patent
Code
|
inventor
|
Date
|
h
|
US-3856237
|
Torian
et al
|
12-1974
|
a
|
US-3648240
|
Jacoby
et al
|
03-1972
|
i
|
US-3586441
|
Zekich
|
05-1986
|
b
|
US-3658277
|
Anderson
|
04-1972
|
j
|
US-4644845
|
Garehime
|
02-1987
|
c
|
US-3697972
|
Brown
|
10-1972
|
k
|
US-4816828
|
Feher
|
03-1989
|
d
|
US-3704845
|
Ord
|
12-1972
|
l
|
US-6308644
|
Diaz
|
10-2001
|
e
|
US-3750158
|
Anastassakis
|
07-1973
|
m
|
FR
2584842
|
Borthayre
|
07-1985
|
f
|
US-3811643
|
Pizzo
|
05-1974
|
|
|
|
|
g
|
US-3841328
|
Jensen
|
10-1974
|
n
|
HK
Productivity Council search from
PCT WO 01/39396 Al
|
Deutsch
|
31-05-01
|
|
|
A
story of filthy
history , please
stop your hand!
1.
The HK special agent had ulterior motives and attempt to persuade inventor
to give up the patent application !
The
evidence
to
shown
香港的政工人員別有用心地企圖說服發明人放棄專利申請?!
2.
The special agent of Taiwan was to intervene again, so the
patent lawyer do not get permission from
inventor and further to change design
drawing, This kind of behavior violate professional morals!
(專利律师沒有得到發明人自行修改設計圖而不超越原发明,难道這種行為違反專法規定)
The evidence was to shown that the patent agent of
Taiwan and Washington had used a sly means and completely no
sincerity in submitting to Patent Office's examine! They
violate the agency contract of patent application !
(証據顯示,台灣及華盛頓的專利申請代理在答辯的期限前施展混身解數,由於有江澤民辦公室的人馬在從中作梗,所以他們完全沒有誠意提交對專利局審查的答辯!他們非常理地違反了申請專利代理合約!)
美國專利由原先辦理本在中國申請的優先權的深圳市順天達專利商標代理有限公司
轉聘台灣的巨群國際商標事務所再轉聘華盛頓的RABIN & BERDO, P.C.遞交到美國專利局。 但有股反動的惡勢力正在禍國殃民!落佐Order不願看到林哲民在美國獲得專利成功並誘以巨大的“國防利益” 並兌現在911後後的10-12月一度揭起的美國售武台灣熱潮!
因此,
有特工背景的勢力介入下導致了台灣及華盛頓的專利事務所的落格!
他們不經發明人同意便暗中做了手腳,私自刪除了專利申請附圖f兩道門隱蔽的位置,引致了美國審查員疑問說為什麼檢測手段不在兩道門內?
但明顯撒謊及扯皮的台灣及華盛頓的專利事務所早就企圖不在2002年11月14日答辯,如果不是發明人當機立斷地在期限前以傳真、Email及郵件遞交,後果不堪設想!
這股禍國殃民反動的惡勢力後台是誰?為什麼一定要暗中作梗干涉及深圳、台灣、華盛頓專利事務所刻意竄改專利申請文件如此垃圾!
上述這股禍國殃民反動的惡勢力後台正是江澤民辦公室一干人馬!以默許售武臺灣換取布殊政府不承認林哲民(lzm)專利就是一種赤裸裸的賣國行力!
為什麼江澤民辦公室一干人馬會如此不計後果呢?因為lzm一旦獲得如此重大的美國專利在國際上將赫赫有名,
那麼,由江澤民辦公室一干人馬主導的在1999年強行並野蠻拍賣lzm在深圳及東莞工廠的醜事將暴光,請點擊江澤民的頭像便知分曉!
3.
香港的創新科技署長靠呃有功並獲頒發“大紫荊金章”?
怎呃呢?創新科技署長指揮生産力促進局廖德榮落格寫了份報告將上述這一份美國專利的申請批駁得一錢不值,
到底是否一錢不值對比下面的所有外國專利便有答案!
廖德榮一年之後(Jun
25, 2003)的回應盡顯斯文敗類的本色!林哲民在當時獲得智産局熱情邀請告知可獲資助申請專利,但要先交的3000元!但廖德榮出賣人格,無知及下三流並缺德!以概念為藉口否認了專利發明的可行性,
香港的創新科技署生産力促進局歧視及剝奪了lzm的公民權 ,創新科技署長就是以此獲得江核心人馬的“賞識”獲頒發“大紫荊金章”為獎!
航空安全三措施出爐後!各中文媒體均不明中國政府為何會突然間對美親熱異常並容忍售武台灣!
若將時光倒流,記得太約在2001年的10月底,
當世界傳媒的焦點專注者江澤民主席在上海以主人的身份招待亞太區領袖並發表反恐宣言熱鼓朝天之時,
而另一邊廂,朱總隻身南下廣卅,
孤身只影前往觀賞一劇
“凊朝宰相
”辛酸史劇,號稱鐵面宰相的總理朱容基暗然淚下,
明報的記者對此有
“大家心照”
的不平之鳴!
但這完全一廂情願的,看那江澤民的那股
騷勁,實情是老江欲借上海亞太區領袖聚會之機與布殊親熱交媾,以默許售武臺灣出買國防利益在交換不承認布殊在芝加哥機場公佈應用
林哲民(lzm)承救911股市危機“航空安全三措施”發明在美國的專利申請!
儘管lzm獨家披露暴光,江核心也盡力補過,售台的8艘潛艇至今仍未能落實,但江澤民賣國動機罪仍罪責難逃!
朱總被驅逐隻身南下廣卅,只是方便老江出賣國防利益恐事敗而已!
|
|
寄语 |